The Apparel Brand That Looked Fine On Paper
We were approached by a well known apparel brand that had been running email for a couple of years. They had Klaviyo set up, a handful of flows live, and a reasonable size list. On the surface, things looked functional. Open rates were acceptable. The abandoned basket flow was recovering some revenue. They weren't unhappy with their email, they just weren't sure it was pulling its weight.
A proper review told a different story. Their abandoned basket sequence had one email. Their welcome series had three emails but no purchase incentive, and a conversion rate well below benchmark. They had no browse abandonment flow at all. Their post-purchase sequence stopped after the order confirmation. Over 40% of their list was classed as unengaged with no suppression strategy in place, quietly dragging down deliverability across every send. And their highest-value customers, the people spending three or four times the average order value, were receiving identical campaigns to everyone else.
The gap between what the programme was generating and what it should have been generating came to just over £38,000 in recoverable annual revenue. That wasn't a best-case projection. It was a conservative estimate built from their own data: list size, average order value, purchase frequency, and the distance between current flow performance and realistic benchmarks for their category.
Within three months of fixing the core gaps, which meant deepening the abandoned basket sequence, rebuilding the welcome series, launching browser abandonment, cleaning the list and implementing proper suppression, they were tracking ahead of that figure.