Insight

Why Most Amazon Ad Accounts Have a Structure Problem, Not a Bid Problem

TL:DR

Most Amazon advertising problems aren't caused by bids being wrong. They're caused by accounts being optimised around ACOS instead of growth.
Constantly adjusting bids or relying too heavily on automation can improve efficiency temporarily, but it won't fix a structure that's missing key campaign roles.
We rebuilt one client's over-automated Amazon account into a manually controlled, segmented structure, lifting ROAS by 35% and revenue by 34% as a result.
Sponsored Brands revenue alone grew 382% once upper-funnel activity was properly introduced.
Our guarantee: no ROAS improvement in a given month, no fee for that month.

Claim Your Free Amazon Ads Audit (Usually £800)

Foreword

Most brands don't come to us because they haven't spent enough on Amazon Ads. They come to us because they've spent plenty, yet ACOS continues to rise and sales growth starts to plateau.

‍

The common response is to focus on bids. Increase the bids on keywords that aren't getting enough visibility. Reduce the bids on targets that are becoming inefficient. Let automation tools continuously adjust bids in the hope that performance improves.

‍

The problem is that bids are only one part of the equation. They can help optimise an existing strategy, but they cannot fix an account that lacks the right structure.

‍

When an Amazon account relies too heavily on bid adjustments, brands often end up optimising for efficiency rather than growth. Campaigns that should be discovering new search terms are judged only on ACOS. Proven converting keywords remain mixed with broader targeting. Upper-funnel activity such as Sponsored Brands, Video and Store Spotlight is neglected because it doesn't immediately deliver the same return as lower-funnel campaigns.

‍

Over time, the account becomes increasingly focused on capturing existing demand, rather than creating new opportunities and growing total sales.

Where The Structure Actually Breaks

‍

A successful Amazon advertising strategy isn't built around one campaign type or one metric. Different campaign types serve different purposes, and each needs to play its role in moving shoppers through the buying journey.

‍

Auto, broad and phrase match campaigns are designed to uncover new search terms and identify opportunities. Once those terms prove they convert, they should move into exact match campaigns where the budget can be focused on proven demand.

‍

Product targeting campaigns allow brands to appear alongside competitors and influence shoppers who are already considering alternatives.

‍

Sponsored Brands, Sponsored Brands Video and Store Spotlight help build visibility and ensure customers discover your brand before they are ready to buy.

‍

Sponsored Display helps re-engage shoppers who have already shown interest but didn't convert.

‍

When these layers are missing or incorrectly structured, brands often try to solve the problem by adjusting bids. But no amount of bid optimisation can replace a complete advertising strategy. The brands that scale on Amazon aren't just the ones bidding more efficiently; they're the ones with an account structure designed to capture demand at every stage.

What This Looks Like In Practice

‍

Label Weavers, a US manufacturer of custom woven and printed labels, name tapes and care labels, came to us with an account that had been left to an automated bidding system. It prioritised scale over control, and control was exactly what was missing: campaigns had duplicated over time, variation families were grouped inconsistently, and Sponsored Brands and Sponsored Display were barely used. The account leant almost entirely on lower-funnel spend, with nothing above it building visibility or bringing shoppers back.

‍

We rebuilt it as a manual, segmented structure, one campaign type per job: auto and broad match for discovery, phrase match to refine intent, exact match for the terms already converting, and manual product targeting for competitor and ASIN-level control. Every legacy campaign was paused so the data behind future decisions was clean rather than inherited. Base bids came down, and top-of-search placements were prioritised against historical performance data rather than left to an algorithm's guesswork. Sponsored Brands and Sponsored Display were then built out properly for the first time: product collections around hero lines, Store Spotlight for category presence, and retargeting to recover shoppers who'd already shown intent.

‍

ROAS improved by 35%. Revenue grew 34%. Sponsored Brands revenue, from a near-standing start, grew 382%.

‍

Read the full Label Weavers case study.

‍

What this means for you:

If your Amazon optimisation consists primarily of increasing and decreasing bids, you're only solving part of the problem. Bids influence efficiency, but account structure determines growth. Discovery campaigns uncover new opportunities, exact campaigns maximise proven demand, Sponsored Brands and video build awareness, and Sponsored Display recaptures shoppers who didn't buy first time. When those layers are missing, no amount of bid tweaking will deliver the growth you're looking for. Eventually, performance stagnates because you're optimising efficiency instead of building demand.

No Result, No Fee For That Month

‍

That result came from getting the structure right. The guarantee we put behind new engagements is a separate commitment, and just as concrete: we back it because a promise costs us nothing if it's wrong.

‍

If we don't improve your ROAS within a given month of the first three, that month's management fee is refunded in full. We're not asking you to trust a framework on paper; we're putting our own fee against it.

‍

The pricing sits on a flat fee for our time, not a percentage of your ad spend, so scaling the account doesn't scale our invoice. And where the first three months prove the approach out, we move into a twelve-month partnership at the same service level, not a renegotiated one.

‍

As an Amazon Verified Partner, we run this kind of audit and rebuild as a core part of what we do, and we'd rather show you where your own account's structure is costing you than tell you in the abstract. If you'd like the same audit run against your account, it's yours free of charge (normally £800), with no obligation to go further. The same guarantee applies from day one: no ROAS improvement in a given month, no fee for that month.

Copy Link to Share

Copied