What This Means For You

If a campaign has been running efficient and Limited by Budget for a while, the reported efficiency you've grown used to was partly a side effect of budget scarcity, not purely the target doing its job. Once that scarcity effect goes, the target is what you get. That's worth knowing before a board pack cites last quarter's CPA as the baseline for next quarter's spend increase.

What We'd Actually Do About It

Three things, in order:

  1. Pull every Target CPA and Target ROAS campaign currently flagged Limited by Budget. That's your exposure list.
  2. Check whether the target still reflects the margin you can afford, not the number that happened to work when budget was the limiting factor. Google's Bid Target Adjustment Tool lets you update targets if you want to preserve current efficiency; it doesn't do that thinking for you.
  3. If the existing target is a genuine reflection of the business, leave it alone. This isn't a reason to panic-adjust every account on 17 August. It's a reason to check the ones where budget scarcity was doing more of the work than the target.

This is also a reasonable moment to ask a harder question: is the target itself right, or was it set to fit a budget-constrained world that's about to disappear? We've said it before and it holds here too: adding budget to a broken structure just makes the hole more expensive. A tighter Smart Bidding algorithm won't fix a target that was never grounded in margin in the first place.

What This Doesn't Change

It doesn't change the case for POAS over ROAS wherever margin data allows. If anything, a stricter link between target and delivery makes the metric you're targeting matter more, not less. A precisely-hit ROAS target on the wrong metric is still the wrong outcome, just more reliably wrong.

Not sure which of your campaigns are exposed before 17 August? Get in touch and we'll take a look. You'll get a straightforward view on whether the target needs changing, the campaign does, or neither.